Follow
A mutual over on the birdsite was suggesting that they find Q&A with ChatGPT more productive than reading manuals, and suggested that by pointing out the likelihood of incorrect answers, I was treating this as an "academic pie-in-the-sky" topic. 🤔
As an experiment I went and asked it 4 questions and got 2 dangerously subtly wrong answers, 1 blatantly incorrect answer, and 1 useless non-answer.
